Offbeat Karaoke News

June 9, 2009

Cardioke - Exercise and Sing - How Appealing

Filed under: Strange Products, What? ANOTHER Karaoke Law? — Tags: , — admin @ 9:04 am

Billy Blanks Jrs Cardioke

Billy Blanks Jrs Cardioke

For most of us lifting a beer between singing songs is the most exercise we want on our karaoke nights out.  So imagine “Cardioke” with this mouthful of a description:  “an interactive physical and visual jumbo screen cardio-vascular, sing-a-long/karaoke work out … incorporating proper diaphragmatic performance breathing while being able to accommodate all genres of music.”

That’s the concept that Anthony P. Ricco says he came up with and pitched to Billy Blanks, Jr. and Sharon Blanks.  If the name Billy Blank rings a bell it’s probably because of the Tae Boe fitness guru you see doing the infomertials, and yep, these are his youngsters.  Ricco is now claiming that they fraudently applied for a trademark on the name and failed to pay him 30% of the gross profits to which he is due.

This gets so complicated it wears me out.  You can read an earlier complaint that the Blanks filed against Riccio and on which they received a judgment.  It’s kinda interesting because of how things work in the high powered world of entertainment.

I’m not sure what the big fuss is because the trademark lapsed and is no longer valid anyway.  It was “abandoned” February 28, 2008.

Ricco and the Blanks used to be friends according to news reporst.  I’m guessing they no longer invite each other to their Saturday afternoon cookouts now.

June 3, 2009

Disgruntled Man Sues Over Karaoke Wizard of Oz Production

Filed under: Karaoke Entertainment, What? ANOTHER Karaoke Law? — Tags: , , — admin @ 9:24 am

Witch from The Wizard of Oz casting a spell on people who sue her stage production

Witch from The Wizard of Oz casting a spell on people who sue her stage production

In what is an insult to karaoke fans everywhere, the London newspaper The Mail is reporting that Adrian Bradbury is launching a legal action against the producers of a stage musical production of ‘The Wizard of Oz’. 
 
What’s his complaint?

Mr. Bradbury, a fan of ‘The Wizard of Oz’ says, “When the music starts it normally makes the hairs stand up on the back of your neck, but instead it was obvious that it was a synthesised backing tape.”

Now granted, he probably is going to be a bit more critical than you or me because he is a professional musician.  He says the use of the karaoke tracks meant “there could be absolutely no interaction between the singer and the music”.  He did compliment the show by saying “there were some good special effects and a lovely little dog - but it wasn’t a musical.”

Sir Harrison Birtwistle, the UK’s foremost living composer, supported Bradbury by writing “The Wizard of Oz is a musical, composed for a cast of singers/actors with orchestral accompaniment, with a musical director in overall control. Without the orchestra or musical director a performance of ‘The Wizard of Oz’ is best described as karaoke.”

Birtwistle explains that in a properly performed musical or opera there is constant interaction between the singer and the band or orchestra. “In karaoke there is no such meaningful dialogue between the singer and the pre-recorded soundtrack - it is no more possible than a caller having a meaningful conversation with an answerphone.”

Bradbury says that it was deceptive advertising for the theater to advertise the show as a “musical”, and he wants his £134.50 back (about $220).  He and his brother, their wives, and seven chldren attended the performance.  No word from the kids on whether they felt deprived.  But for the cost of the tickets, it hardly seems worth the bother to file a lawsuit.

Powered by WordPress